: Britain's met aircraft -

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Britain's met aircraft

#1 User is offline   Dan G 

  • Group: Chasers
  • Posts: 3970
  • Joined: 01-May 05
  • LocationExeter, UK

Posted --

I had no idea we had one! A proper jet too!

Must cost a fortune to run....
0

#2 User is offline   skanky 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5163
  • Joined: 23-July 04
  • LocationSheffield, S8

Posted --

It used to be called MRF (Met research Flight) and was a Hercules (nicknamed Snoopy, I think). I used to go out with one of the women who worked on it (years ago).

 EDIT there's a page about it at that website under "Project History".

 


0

#3 User is offline   RichC 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5057
  • Joined: 17-August 04
  • LocationTiverton, Devon

Posted --

Snoopy retired some years ago and was replaced by the BAe146 which spends alot of time down here in the SW Approaches dropping sondes. It doesnt have half the gear onboard as the Snoopy did, nor does it have the range....not is it MoD owned now....


0

#4 User is offline   Lightning Hunter 

  • Group: Chasers
  • Posts: 11487
  • Joined: 26-June 05
  • LocationNew Milton, Hampshire

Posted --

I recall seeing 'snoopy' once, or at least I thought I did, around the time of the selsey tornado in early 1998. Was it about still then?

0

#5 User is offline   skanky 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5163
  • Joined: 23-July 04
  • LocationSheffield, S8

Posted --

The changeover from MRF & Snoopy to FAAM & 146 all happened around 2000, so yes it would have been.
0

#6 User is offline   Lightning Hunter 

  • Group: Chasers
  • Posts: 11487
  • Joined: 26-June 05
  • LocationNew Milton, Hampshire

Posted --

Well, that's interesting because on the evening of the selsey tornado, I was out in the garden watching a very active thunderstorm just to our SE and, although all other aircraft were avoiding it like the plague, one, which I swear was 'snoopy' (distinctive hercules tone and long point on front) was flying straight towards it and around it. Maybe carrying out research? Who knows.
0

#7 User is offline   RichC 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5057
  • Joined: 17-August 04
  • LocationTiverton, Devon

Posted --

Paul,

The Snoopy did do this, as it was fitted similar along the lines to the WC-130s of the USAF which fly into the Hurricanes (they are now mothballed and are now replaced by WC-130J's) It was more than able to fly right into the eye of a hurricane and a lot more including skirting the storms and flying into the less active areas. The current BAe 146 isn't and has limitations from the CAA i believe aswell. Its wanders around at medium level and when dropping sondes, low level over the sea. It Has limited sensors, a few air scoops and thats it.

The Reason Snoopy looked like it did, is because the huge point at the nose was full of sensors, so the radar which gives the Hercules its characteristic bulbous nose, had to be put on the top of the fuselage in a fairing.

Snoopy was operated by the MoD out of MoD Boscombe Down, the BAe146 is operated jointly by the National Environment Research Council and the UK Met Office. Equipment, like the computers, sensors, and such is owned by a University. It flies out of Woodford usually i think. Callsign if you have a scanner is no longer METMAN (callsign of the Snoopy) but it is now AVRO. This can confuse people as the same callsign is in use by the new Nimrod MRA4 test flights too...

 


0

#8 User is offline   Lightning Hunter 

  • Group: Chasers
  • Posts: 11487
  • Joined: 26-June 05
  • LocationNew Milton, Hampshire

Posted --

Intresting stuff thanks for that Rich! Must have been the plane, I remember seeing it at RIAT or Farnborough around that time too, impressive plane it was too!
0

#9 User is offline   RichC 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5057
  • Joined: 17-August 04
  • LocationTiverton, Devon

Posted --

Incidently, a few weeks after Snoopies retirement, and after sitting at Boscombe Down waiting for mothballing it flew to Exeter for an enthusiasts day and this was the last public appearance of the airplane....in the snoopy guise.


0

#10 User is offline   Dan G 

  • Group: Chasers
  • Posts: 3970
  • Joined: 01-May 05
  • LocationExeter, UK

Posted --

Do you know what happened to Snoopy? Was it just scrapped?

Re the equipment load, I wouldn't be suprised if the 146 can't do just as much science. Instruments and their electronics have got a lot smaller over the years, and the 146 also has racks so they only need to load what will be used on the mission it's flying.
0

#11 User is offline   Lightning Hunter 

  • Group: Chasers
  • Posts: 11487
  • Joined: 26-June 05
  • LocationNew Milton, Hampshire

Posted --

But 146 can't withstand the same forces of the Hercules can it, plus, a bit cramped inside!

0

#12 User is offline   RichC 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5057
  • Joined: 17-August 04
  • LocationTiverton, Devon

Posted --

Dan,
Snoopy was flown back to Marshalls of Cambridge (Who do all the Hercules and Tristar overhauls for the RAF and many air-arms) and converted back into a normal C-130 (C-130H standard) and sold to the Royal Netherlands Air Force. It was flown at Boscombe for a while afterwards (in standard Herc guise) as a hercules test bed, you wouldnt even have known it was Snoopy. Because it had so little flying hours compared with the RAf's C-130K models, it was released for tender and the Dutch bought it.

The only benefit from the BAe146 is that it is faster and higher flying. The Snoopy used to go where most planes don't or can't. Just like the current hordes of American WC-130J's.

Typically of the Government, they got rid of Metman (Snoopy) due to costs, as it certainly wasnt due to the work hours!

0

#13 User is offline   Chris CW (aka Seedubs) 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1054
  • Joined: 20-December 04
  • LocationNewport, South Wales.

Posted --

One of these bad boys [hehe] :

 

 

Although it was a while ago and quite some way away!!

 


0

#14 User is offline   skanky 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5163
  • Joined: 23-July 04
  • LocationSheffield, S8

Posted --

" Snoopy was flown back to Marshalls of Cambridge (Who do all the Hercules and Tristar overhauls for the RAF and many air-arms) and converted back into a normal C-130 (C-130H standard)"

 

I think I saw it arrive for the conversion. I was living in Cambridge around then. I had no idea why it was there are the time (though I knew of the Marshalls/C130 connection).


0

#15 User is offline   RichC 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5057
  • Joined: 17-August 04
  • LocationTiverton, Devon

Posted --

seebubs,
That looks like South Georgia to me.... taken from a C-130K Tanker bubble on the top of the fuselage, and from Mount Pleasant in the Falklands Islands.
Am i correct?
0

#16 User is offline   Chris CW (aka Seedubs) 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1054
  • Joined: 20-December 04
  • LocationNewport, South Wales.

Posted --

Very much correct m8, doing a mail drop on the way down past the south sandwich to see a large chunk of ice that had broken off one of the antarctic shelves back in 1991/1992. Good drills!! lol

(I was on a jolly for the day, and I smoked at the time, so no smoking for about 20 hours!)  


0

#17 User is offline   Dereknf 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 18-August 05

Posted --

I've been a lurker here for a while but saw so many inaccuracies in this thread I had to reply.
The aircraft is the prototype BAe146 and was converted at Woodford to the Met aircraft in 2002/2003 and first flew in October 2003. It flew with an AVRO callsign then during the test flights until early 2004. Since then I believe it uses the METMAN callsign. It will only use AVRO when being flown by BAE pilots.
The BAe146-301 entered service with FAAM/NERC whatever in April 2004 or thereabouts. It is operated out of Cranfield by Directflight on behalf of the universities and the Met office. The aircraft is still owned by BAE Systems.
The 146 is cheaper to run and can do pretty anything the C-130 did, with the exception of a reduced endurance. I don't believe there are any CAA limitations on the 146 that a standard 146/RJ doesn't have. Then again I haven't been involved for a few years.
The Met C-130 was retired in May 2001 I think and went back to Marshalls at Cambridge to be converted to a test bed for the Airbus A400M engine.
I was involved in the flight testing of the BAe146 so I hope this clarifies a few things.

Derek
0

#18 User is offline   admin 

  • Administrator
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 10
  • Joined: 22-January 06

Posted --

Hi Derek, many thanks for signing up and taking the time to clarify those details [y]
Welcome to UKww.


0

#19 User is offline   RichC 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5057
  • Joined: 17-August 04
  • LocationTiverton, Devon

Posted --

Thanks for clarifying things Derek,
A few weeks ago it was working in the SW Approaches using an AVRO callsign, of which its antics were NOTAM'd in dropping sondes etc. (As it is this month). I have heard it many times lately down here talking with Swanwick Mil Special Tasks cell and local LARS, and none have been using the Metman callsign even though this is the callsign that is in the NOTAM's also so i guess its still being flown by BAe pilots or they have not changed.
0

#20 User is offline   Dereknf 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 18-August 05

Posted --

I'll try and find out tomorrow. The Nimrod MRA4 drops things as well and occasionally operates down that way! I know the 146 has used the METMAN callsign in the past.

Derek
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users