: The carbon footprint of the Royal Wedding -

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

The carbon footprint of the Royal Wedding

#1 Guest_Veraz_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted --

Article here

http://www.telegraph...al-wedding.html

It was nice to see the Queen doing her bit on the day- she had a blanket over her legs in the royal car on the way to the cathedral. She must have asked the driver to turn the heating down to offset the carbon footprint

666

I still love you Kate :'(

#2 User is offline   HSEA 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3128
  • Joined: 10-August 03

Posted --

I wonder if Charles aston that William borrowed is still being run on booze?!

http://www.telegraph...ne-powered.html

Bet they have to keep Phillip from siphoning off the fuel tank...
0

#3 Guest_Village_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted --

Good luck to them.

We should all be increasing our carbon footprint if we believe in more life and more diversity of life. The surest way to reduce all life on this planet is to sequester carbon....which *text removed by management* was it who first made out that locking away carbon was good for life on this planet?

How perverse things are these days.

#4 User is online   John Mason 

  • Group: Warnings Team Managers
  • Posts: 20841
  • Joined: 04-March 03
  • LocationMachynlleth, Mid-Wales

Posted --

Quote

HSEA - 3/5/2011 16:29  Bet they have to keep Phillip from siphoning off the fuel tank...

And what's wrong with that, demmit? ;)

Cheers - John


0

#5 User is online   John Mason 

  • Group: Warnings Team Managers
  • Posts: 20841
  • Joined: 04-March 03
  • LocationMachynlleth, Mid-Wales

Posted --

Quote

Village - 3/5/2011 16:44 Good luck to them. We should all be increasing our carbon footprint if we believe in more life and more diversity of life. The surest way to reduce all life on this planet is to sequester carbon....which *text removed by management* was it who first made out that locking away carbon was good for life on this planet? How perverse things are these days.

Just as well an awful lot of the stuff was locked away in the Carboniferous Period - or you petrolheads would be stuck for happy-juice.

You'd still be trying to work out how to soup-up your donkey ;)

Cheers - John


0

#6 User is offline   Brian S 

  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 5279
  • Joined: 14-July 03
  • LocationSeaton, East Devon - UK

Posted --

here is one way [y]
0

#7 User is offline   Andy Mayhew 

  • Group: Executive
  • Posts: 23774
  • Joined: 15-October 02
  • LocationEvesham, Worcs

Posted --

LOL! [hehe]

And to be serious, more or less CO2 in the atmosphere is not currenty the issue when it comes to diversity (or lack thereof) of life on Planet Earth.
0

#8 User is offline   Andy Mayhew 

  • Group: Executive
  • Posts: 23774
  • Joined: 15-October 02
  • LocationEvesham, Worcs

Posted --

And back to the Telegraph article, who do they get to write these things?

Quote

Already the couple have done a few small things to limit their footprint. Kate’s ring is reported to be made from Welsh gold rather than minerals from an exploitative mine.


Everyone knows that the wedding ring came from Welsh gold, it's a very long standing tradition :s
0

#9 User is online   John Mason 

  • Group: Warnings Team Managers
  • Posts: 20841
  • Joined: 04-March 03
  • LocationMachynlleth, Mid-Wales

Posted --

Welsh gold will one day be worth writing a book about - I have had some experience in that area! I might even put pen to paper one day!

Cheers - John

 


0

#10 Guest_Village_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted --

Quote

John Mason - 3/5/2011 18:10

Quote

Village - 3/5/2011 16:44 Good luck to them. We should all be increasing our carbon footprint if we believe in more life and more diversity of life. The surest way to reduce all life on this planet is to sequester carbon....which *text removed by management* was it who first made out that locking away carbon was good for life on this planet? How perverse things are these days.

Just as well an awful lot of the stuff was locked away in the Carboniferous Period - or you petrolheads would be stuck for happy-juice.

You'd still be trying to work out how to soup-up your donkey ;)

Cheers - John

Yes, that much would be true John. However, there would be a great deal more life and it would be pleasnt living in the Arctic Circle where its virtually impossible currently and no crops can be grown.



#11 Guest_Village_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted --

Quote

John Mason - 3/5/2011 18:46

Welsh gold will one day be worth writing a book about - I have had some experience in that area! I might even put pen to paper one day!

Cheers - John

 

John, I know you are a secret panner on the quiet. You say you dont prescribe to capitalism, but you cant resist the occasional panning to find your fortune all the same! right? ;)



#12 User is online   John Mason 

  • Group: Warnings Team Managers
  • Posts: 20841
  • Joined: 04-March 03
  • LocationMachynlleth, Mid-Wales

Posted --

No, Vill, not these days. It has been completely banned! One or two people ignored the warnings and got rather industrial-scale in their operations!

I wound down after the huge 2001 flash-flood. Following several years of digging waist-deep in water for a few flakes of gold, a walk down the river after that storm was all it took to find a 6.5 gramme nugget, my biggest ever, and it was extracted using nothing more than my land-rover ignition key!

I'll just wait for the next monster flood instead :)

Cheers - John


0

#13 Guest_Village_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted --

Well done john.....you see you do have a touch of the Capitalist in you after all! ;)

#14 User is online   John Mason 

  • Group: Warnings Team Managers
  • Posts: 20841
  • Joined: 04-March 03
  • LocationMachynlleth, Mid-Wales

Posted --

Well, I guess there's nothing wrong with capitalism, except there are good and bad varieties out there. The same principle applies to bacteria, of course.... ;)

Cheers - John


0

#15 Guest_Veraz_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted --

Any chance that we may keep this thread on the topic of the carbon footprint of the Royal Wedding?

#16 User is offline   ldavidcooke 

  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 5160
  • Joined: 18-July 06
  • LocationGraham, NC USA

Posted --

Hey Chris,

Sad to say, in a word, no...

Cheers!
Dave
0

#17 User is offline   Anabolic North 

  • Group: Chasers
  • Posts: 1244
  • Joined: 07-April 09

Posted --

Quote

carbon footprint of the Royal Wedding?


Do me a favour! This is quite the most ridiculous subject I've read for some time....

0

#18 User is offline   admin 

  • Administrator
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 10
  • Joined: 22-January 06

Posted --

Thread frozen
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users