PWS no more? Monbiot column
#1
Posted 26 January 2012 - 13:40
A look at PWS's page says they've ceased trading. Given I've never seen any meteorological creditials this is a very good thing, in my opinion. Calling out non-meteorologists who insist on issuing such ludicrous forecasts is a very good thing.
#2
Posted 26 January 2012 - 13:49
"So there's an opening in the market for a weather forecaster for the Daily Mail?Here's my application:
Today it's going to rain, and that might give you cancer (especially if taken with multivitamins and white wine).
Tomorrow it's also going to rain, and it probably wouldn't have, if it weren't for single mothers, gays and immigrants.
In fact, it'll rain all week.
And next week, too.
Not like it was years ago.
Oh, and the sky is falling down."
If I knew who it was I'd send them an invite to Hopecast Central!
Cheers - John
#3
Posted 26 January 2012 - 13:58
#4
Posted 26 January 2012 - 14:11
I didn't see the article at the time but apparently that well known red top carried an article two days ago with comments from JP about the Arctic Blast to Come TM (including the phrase "nightmare January") [facepalm] . Google SNOW ON THE WAY IN ARCTIC COLDSNAP if you must
If he's really ill then its no cause to gloat of course but PWS will not be missed by anyone not interested in daft headline fodder to publish, for sure.
This post has been edited by Big Dave's Gusset: 26 January 2012 - 14:19
#5
Posted 26 January 2012 - 14:12
I agree that whilst the article did provide some good laughs it also had a serious message.
#7 Guest_Chris Lloyd_*
Posted 26 January 2012 - 17:58
Just need the Daily Mail and the Express to go bust and there'll be nothing to talk about.
<--- Awaits the usual responses
#8
Posted 26 January 2012 - 18:12
Chris Lloyd, on 26 January 2012 - 17:58, said:
Just need the Daily Mail and the Express to go bust and there'll be nothing to talk about.
<--- Awaits the usual responses
Yes there will! We can actually concentrate on discussing reality!
Cheers - John
#9
Posted 26 January 2012 - 18:17
Chris Lloyd, on 26 January 2012 - 17:58, said:
Just need the Daily Mail and the Express to go bust and there'll be nothing to talk about.
<--- Awaits the usual responses
I cannot understand you cynisism of UKww Chris.
The head of PWS is a member here. He never, as I recall answered his critics on this site. ( no contributions for years) . If Monbiots blog has truth to it (I've no reason to doubt that atm) its shameful and repugnant and hopefully the newspapers concerned will start reporting from accredited meteorologists who have substance... in fact they need look no further than the person who started this thread.
#10
Posted 26 January 2012 - 18:45
Uskys, on 26 January 2012 - 18:17, said:
The head of PWS is a member here. He never, as I recall answered his critics on this site. ( no contributions for years) . If Monibots blog has truth to it (I've no reason to doubt that atm) its shameful and repugnant and hopefully the newspapers concerned will start reporting from accredited meteorologists who have substance... in fact they need look no further than the person who started this thread.
Yes. I have long been tired of the people I meet in shops, cafes and pubs who simply blanket forecasting with the "they never get it right" sweep. Such a statement is clearly complete bollocks, but one wants to inquire why it was said. In almost all cases it came not from UKww Convective Outlooks or Paul's splendid synoptic discussions, people like Gavin or Matt over at TWO, or even (!) METO 1-14 day discussions, but from this shameful bullshit emanating from a few tabloids, which very many people read and, sadly, seem to take as gospel.
It was Carl Sagan, who memorably said something along the following lines:
We have designed our civilization based on science and technology and at the same time arranged things so that almost no one understands anything at all about science and technology. This is a clear prescription for disaster.
As time goes by, the clearer this becomes......
Cheers - John
#11
Posted 26 January 2012 - 18:48
#12
Posted 26 January 2012 - 19:08
It really used to Madden me ( pun intended ) how orgs like that were given more column inches than properly qualified experts.
#13 Guest_Chris Lloyd_*
Posted 26 January 2012 - 20:03
Uskys, on 26 January 2012 - 18:17, said:
Who was / is that then Andy?
And I am correct, it will stop all the pointless threads about it. They just end up being threads to poke fun and ridicule. If he has no presence, no threads about him - simple as.
#14
Posted 26 January 2012 - 20:06
Chris Lloyd, on 26 January 2012 - 20:03, said:
And I am correct, it will stop all the pointless threads about it. They just end up being threads to poke fun and ridicule. If he has no presence, no threads about him - simple as.
Chris his name is mentioned in the article posted in the link in the first post. You not read it?
#15
Posted 26 January 2012 - 20:15
#17
Posted 26 January 2012 - 20:57
#18
Posted 26 January 2012 - 21:07
Howard Kirby, on 26 January 2012 - 20:57, said:
http://www.ukweather...__1#entry250230
#19 Guest_Chris Lloyd_*
Posted 26 January 2012 - 23:14
Howard Kirby, on 26 January 2012 - 20:57, said:
I see what you mean. Not surprised he left with his tail between his legs. As for being up against it, I can see why I get so much flack when I inadvertently end up defending the motives behind why the forecasts are given (ie simple air time in newspapers), and not the content per se. Jonathon Powell was very good at promoting his website. Producing sensationalist headlines for the press is what he was all about. Nothing to do with serious forecasting.
I have always been very clear about the motives and never given any consideration to the facts because that is not what it is about with him. We are talking about what sells newspapers and who provides the stories - that's all. The fact that people take the forecasts too seriously and start making comparisons with good forecasting is where it all gets taken completely out of context.
By the way, if Jonathon Powell is ill then I wish him all the best for the future.
Big Dave, on 26 January 2012 - 21:07, said:
Cheers BDG
#20
Posted 27 January 2012 - 13:17
http://www.dailymail...es-Britain.html












Sign In »
Register Now!
Help
This topic is locked












