: PWS no more? Monbiot column -

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

PWS no more? Monbiot column

#1 User is offline   PaulKn 

  • Group: Chasers
  • Posts: 19950
  • Joined: 08-March 03

Posted 26 January 2012 - 13:40

George Monbiot recently wrote a blog asking about the credentials of various 'forecasters' whose quotes appear in publications like the Daily Express and Daily Mail. His latest entry specifically targets PWS and can be found here: http://www.guardian....P=FBCNETTXT9038

A look at PWS's page says they've ceased trading. Given I've never seen any meteorological creditials this is a very good thing, in my opinion. Calling out non-meteorologists who insist on issuing such ludicrous forecasts is a very good thing.
2

#2 User is offline   John Mason 

  • Group: Warnings Team Managers
  • Posts: 20837
  • Joined: 04-March 03
  • LocationMachynlleth, Mid-Wales

Posted 26 January 2012 - 13:49

Some amusing comments beneath the piece. I liked this one:

"So there's an opening in the market for a weather forecaster for the Daily Mail?Here's my application:

Today it's going to rain, and that might give you cancer (especially if taken with multivitamins and white wine).

Tomorrow it's also going to rain, and it probably wouldn't have, if it weren't for single mothers, gays and immigrants.

In fact, it'll rain all week.

And next week, too.

Not like it was years ago.

Oh, and the sky is falling down."

If I knew who it was I'd send them an invite to Hopecast Central!


Cheers - John



0

#3 User is offline   Dave W 

  • Group: Executive
  • Posts: 5358
  • Joined: 17-October 03
  • LocationBrighton

Posted 26 January 2012 - 13:58

A serious point made though by George Monbiot.. such 'antics' as those discussed were certainly given forecasters a bad name.
0

#4 User is offline   Dave K 

  • Group: Registered Climate Users
  • Posts: 16847
  • Joined: 31-May 06
  • LocationTonbridge, Kent. 44m asl.

Posted 26 January 2012 - 14:11

I expect the Met Office will get the blame ;)

I didn't see the article at the time but apparently that well known red top carried an article two days ago with comments from JP about the Arctic Blast to Come TM
(including the phrase "nightmare January") [facepalm] . Google SNOW ON THE WAY IN ARCTIC COLDSNAP if you must

If he's really ill then its no cause to gloat of course but PWS will not be missed by anyone not interested in daft headline fodder to publish, for sure.

This post has been edited by Big Dave's Gusset: 26 January 2012 - 14:19

0

#5 User is offline   JohnG 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 402
  • Joined: 19-June 07

Posted 26 January 2012 - 14:12

Fantastic news that PWS have ceased to be. However, I bet that won't stop the Daily Mail and other such newspapers from issuing more bogus weather stories/non-stories :(

I agree that whilst the article did provide some good laughs it also had a serious message.
0

#6 User is offline   Stuart Robinson 

  • Group: Executive
  • Posts: 4195
  • Joined: 15-October 02
  • LocationMountsorrel, Leicestershire.

Posted 26 January 2012 - 14:16

Last Daily Mail PWS qoute was 16th Jan 2012.

http://www.dailymail...utton=Clear+all
0

#7 Guest_Chris Lloyd_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 26 January 2012 - 17:58

Oh well, if he has gone off the radar it will serve to stop all of the pointless threads about the man on here. ;)
Just need the Daily Mail and the Express to go bust and there'll be nothing to talk about. :lol:

<--- Awaits the usual responses :P

#8 User is offline   John Mason 

  • Group: Warnings Team Managers
  • Posts: 20837
  • Joined: 04-March 03
  • LocationMachynlleth, Mid-Wales

Posted 26 January 2012 - 18:12

View PostChris Lloyd, on 26 January 2012 - 17:58, said:

Oh well, if he has gone off the radar it will serve to stop all of the pointless threads about the man on here. ;)
Just need the Daily Mail and the Express to go bust and there'll be nothing to talk about. :lol:

<--- Awaits the usual responses :P


Yes there will! We can actually concentrate on discussing reality! :lol:

Cheers - John
0

#9 User is offline   Uskys 

  • Group: Forum Managers
  • Posts: 26338
  • Joined: 22-November 02
  • LocationBrecon Beacons, 330m ASL

Posted 26 January 2012 - 18:17

View PostChris Lloyd, on 26 January 2012 - 17:58, said:

Oh well, if he has gone off the radar it will serve to stop all of the pointless threads about the man on here. ;)
Just need the Daily Mail and the Express to go bust and there'll be nothing to talk about. :lol:

<--- Awaits the usual responses :P


I cannot understand you cynisism of UKww Chris.

The head of PWS is a member here. He never, as I recall answered his critics on this site. ( no contributions for years) . If Monbiots blog has truth to it (I've no reason to doubt that atm) its shameful and repugnant and hopefully the newspapers concerned will start reporting from accredited meteorologists who have substance... in fact they need look no further than the person who started this thread.
1

#10 User is offline   John Mason 

  • Group: Warnings Team Managers
  • Posts: 20837
  • Joined: 04-March 03
  • LocationMachynlleth, Mid-Wales

Posted 26 January 2012 - 18:45

View PostUskys, on 26 January 2012 - 18:17, said:

I cannot understand you cynisism of UKww Chris.

The head of PWS is a member here. He never, as I recall answered his critics on this site. ( no contributions for years) . If Monibots blog has truth to it (I've no reason to doubt that atm) its shameful and repugnant and hopefully the newspapers concerned will start reporting from accredited meteorologists who have substance... in fact they need look no further than the person who started this thread.


Yes. I have long been tired of the people I meet in shops, cafes and pubs who simply blanket forecasting with the "they never get it right" sweep. Such a statement is clearly complete bollocks, but one wants to inquire why it was said. In almost all cases it came not from UKww Convective Outlooks or Paul's splendid synoptic discussions, people like Gavin or Matt over at TWO, or even (!) METO 1-14 day discussions, but from this shameful bullshit emanating from a few tabloids, which very many people read and, sadly, seem to take as gospel.

It was Carl Sagan, who memorably said something along the following lines:

We have designed our civilization based on science and technology and at the same time arranged things so that almost no one understands anything at all about science and technology. This is a clear prescription for disaster.

As time goes by, the clearer this becomes......

Cheers - John
2

#11 User is online   Lightning Hunter 

  • Group: Chasers
  • Posts: 11484
  • Joined: 26-June 05
  • LocationNew Milton, Hampshire

Posted 26 January 2012 - 18:48

What a bizarre tale! I'd only ever heard of 'PWS' on these forums as I don't read 'news'papers.
0

#12 User is offline   Howard Kirby 

  • Group: Forum Managers
  • Posts: 18306
  • Joined: 01-March 04
  • LocationNorth Herefordshire

Posted 26 January 2012 - 19:08

Finally PWS get exposed for what they really were. Charlatan. :D
It really used to Madden me ( pun intended ) how orgs like that were given more column inches than properly qualified experts. :@
0

#13 Guest_Chris Lloyd_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 26 January 2012 - 20:03

View PostUskys, on 26 January 2012 - 18:17, said:

The head of PWS is a member here. He never, as I recall answered his critics on this site. ( no contributions for years) .


Who was / is that then Andy?

And I am correct, it will stop all the pointless threads about it. They just end up being threads to poke fun and ridicule. If he has no presence, no threads about him - simple as. :)

#14 User is offline   Howard Kirby 

  • Group: Forum Managers
  • Posts: 18306
  • Joined: 01-March 04
  • LocationNorth Herefordshire

Posted 26 January 2012 - 20:06

View PostChris Lloyd, on 26 January 2012 - 20:03, said:

Who was / is that then Andy?

And I am correct, it will stop all the pointless threads about it. They just end up being threads to poke fun and ridicule. If he has no presence, no threads about him - simple as. :)

Chris his name is mentioned in the article posted in the link in the first post. You not read it? ;)
0

#15 User is offline   P.K. 

  • Group: Forum Managers
  • Posts: 7667
  • Joined: 16-November 04
  • LocationWatford

Posted 26 January 2012 - 20:15

But who will the Metro find now for their favourite sensationalist weather stories?? :lol:
0

#16 Guest_Chris Lloyd_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 26 January 2012 - 20:52

View PostHoward Kirby, on 26 January 2012 - 20:06, said:

Chris his name is mentioned in the article posted in the link in the first post. You not read it? ;)


I read that it was Jonathon Powell. Did he have an alias? I have been on UKWW since 2004/5 and don't remember seeing him.

#17 User is offline   Howard Kirby 

  • Group: Forum Managers
  • Posts: 18306
  • Joined: 01-March 04
  • LocationNorth Herefordshire

Posted 26 January 2012 - 20:57

Chris I'm pretty sure he used his real name. He only posted in one thread for about a week IIRC then disappeared when he realised what he was up against!
0

#18 User is offline   Dave K 

  • Group: Registered Climate Users
  • Posts: 16847
  • Joined: 31-May 06
  • LocationTonbridge, Kent. 44m asl.

Posted 26 January 2012 - 21:07

View PostHoward Kirby, on 26 January 2012 - 20:57, said:

Chris I'm pretty sure he used his real name. He only posted in one thread for about a week IIRC then disappeared when he realised what he was up against!


http://www.ukweather...__1#entry250230
0

#19 Guest_Chris Lloyd_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 26 January 2012 - 23:14

View PostHoward Kirby, on 26 January 2012 - 20:57, said:

Chris I'm pretty sure he used his real name. He only posted in one thread for about a week IIRC then disappeared when he realised what he was up against!


I see what you mean. Not surprised he left with his tail between his legs. As for being up against it, I can see why I get so much flack when I inadvertently end up defending the motives behind why the forecasts are given (ie simple air time in newspapers), and not the content per se. Jonathon Powell was very good at promoting his website. Producing sensationalist headlines for the press is what he was all about. Nothing to do with serious forecasting.

I have always been very clear about the motives and never given any consideration to the facts because that is not what it is about with him. We are talking about what sells newspapers and who provides the stories - that's all. The fact that people take the forecasts too seriously and start making comparisons with good forecasting is where it all gets taken completely out of context.

By the way, if Jonathon Powell is ill then I wish him all the best for the future.

View PostBig Dave, on 26 January 2012 - 21:07, said:



Cheers BDG

#20 User is offline   mrfizz 

  • Group: Frouks
  • Posts: 696
  • Joined: 28-July 09
  • LocationHome: West Bromwich. Work: Coventry

Posted 27 January 2012 - 13:17

I see on the Daily MAil website that they are now quoting the Met when announcing the forthcoming winter apocalypse.

http://www.dailymail...es-Britain.html
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users