Nice Warm S/E England Should Pay Wales For Water
#1
Posted 21 February 2012 - 22:28
From the BBC
Extract:
The Institute of Civil Engineers (ICE) has called for a water network, similar to the national electricity grid, to help move water to drought areas.
The idea was mooted by London mayor Boris Johnson last year.
The Welsh government said the people of Wales should receive proper value for "this vital resource".
On Monday the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) revealed that much of southern and eastern England was officially in a state of drought.
Hosting a drought summit Environment Secretary Caroline Spelman said groundwater levels in parts of south-east England were lower than in the infamously dry summer of 1976.
A recent UK government water white paper, Water For Life, called for greater interconnection in the UK's water supply system so that resources could be used more flexibly and efficiently.
'National grid'
This call has been echoed by Keith Jones, director of ICE Wales Cymru.
"We have a national grid for electricity, there ought to be some sort of way of naturally transferring water," said Mr Jones.
"There should be a way of moving water from non-drought areas to drought areas.
"As civil engineers anything is possible in terms of building an infrastructure, though we would have to find a way of doing it sustainably."
Severn Trent Water, which supplies water in mid Wales, as well in the English midlands, said it fully supported "water trading".
"Over the last six months Severn Trent has focused on moving raw water supplies across its water 'grid' from the wetter West to the drier East to balance," said a spokesman.
The Wales Office said the transfer of water out of Wales was a matter for the Welsh government.
The Welsh government said there had been no discussions between the Welsh and UK governments about moving water from Wales to parts of England.
To date the UK government had not approached the Welsh government to discuss the matter, said a spokesman.
The spokesman said: "The Welsh government has been clear that any discussion on this issue will be on the basis that the people of Wales should receive proper value for this vital resource and where the environment in Wales is properly protected.
"The current water resource position in Wales is healthy with strategic reservoirs at, or very near to, full capacity.
"This is to be expected for this time of year, but if we have a dry spring, such as those of the last three years, the situation could deteriorate quite rapidly.
"The Welsh government is working closely with the water industry and the Environment Agency in Wales to monitor the situation."
Earlier, speaking on BBC Radio 2's Jeremy Vine show on Tuesday, Plaid Cymru MP Elfyn Llwyd said Wales should receive "a commercial return" for any water it supplied.
The Dwyfor Meirionnydd MP said: "I have to say being realistic, I see no reason why if the Welsh government, with the support of the Welsh people, say we want to come to some accommodation, let's go ahead and do it.
'Commercial return'
"We will have an amicable agreement with our friends in England but on a commercial basis and I think that's entirely appropriate."
Mr Llwyd said: "I would be more than happy for the Welsh government to decide - in discussion with Westminster - we will supply you with water, the Welsh people are fully in support of that, but there should be a commercial return."
He added: "It's not going to be an Opec situation where all of a sudden, a litre of water goes up 10-fold. None of that, just a reasonable, amicable, commercial arrangement."
In a newspaper article last June Boris Johnson called for rain from the mountains of the UK to be used to to tackle water shortages in drier UK areas.
He said he had been in touch with Prof Roger Falconer of Cardiff University, and both believed a possible solution could be to move water via rivers and canals.
His comments prompted former Plaid Cymru leader Dafydd Wigley to call for compensation should water supplies be taken from Wales to ease shortages in England.
#2
Posted 21 February 2012 - 23:26
#3
Posted 22 February 2012 - 03:13
#4
Posted 22 February 2012 - 03:45
We can joke (or not joke) about the Welsh story as much as we like, but there are two serious issues here. First, we've been several times round the Wrekin when it comes to a national water grid, and I've no doubt it will all be forgotten when the heavens open in the SE, as they surely will - only to be resurrected again in another 40 years' time, or whenever. Second, devolution/independence will throw up so many questions about who pays for what that I suspect that everyone, for and agin, will wish they'd never gone there in the first place.
This post has been edited by StephenS: 22 February 2012 - 03:46
#5
Posted 22 February 2012 - 12:32
Its all swings and roundabouts! People always seem happy to bite the hand that feeds them when it suits them.....
#6
Posted 22 February 2012 - 12:49
None of the water companies in the South East are in favour of a national water grid, probably because it might disturb their cozy monopoly of supply,
This post has been edited by lancing: 22 February 2012 - 12:52
#7
Posted 22 February 2012 - 13:35
A link from the Severn to the Thames has been talked of in the past apart from pipelines.
#8
Posted 22 February 2012 - 14:03
Chris Alder, on 22 February 2012 - 12:32, said:
Its all swings and roundabouts! People always seem happy to bite the hand that feeds them when it suits them.....
Indeed.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16812185
N.
#9
Posted 22 February 2012 - 15:06
In Wales this is still a very emotive topic. There is a lot of resent as to valley communities uprooted and flooded to supply water to the English. It is a Very Bad Idea Indeed to make jokes about Tryweryn (Llyn Celyn) in a pub in Bala on a Saturday night - and rightly so IMO - this was a bit like the Highland Clearances except that it didn't happen that long ago.
Here's a link that explains what happened: http://www.llgc.org....ryn/index-e.htm
Cheers - John
#10
Posted 22 February 2012 - 15:17
* either volume or expected comparative catchment.
#11
Posted 22 February 2012 - 15:34
#12
Posted 22 February 2012 - 15:40
Bazmundo, on 22 February 2012 - 15:17, said:
* either volume or expected comparative catchment.
Its almost ready to go... see Thames and Severn Canal Map .. Theres a tunnel already built.
It should be a case of Abstraction from the Severn , then subsequent abstraction from the Thames Into the existing SE Network.
#13
Posted 22 February 2012 - 16:44
But anyway, the English don't need any more Welsh water. They already have Kielder. Eventually we'll get that pipeline dug ....... though I bet before then we have a run of wet winters in the south with widespread flooding.
#14
Posted 22 February 2012 - 16:51
Big Dave, on 22 February 2012 - 15:34, said:
Naah - we're OK we've got more rock than anyone could ever need over here and all! I don't eat a lot of bread, enjoy a bit of lamb every week, my guinness comes from Ireland and my vino from lots of countries. Starting to run out of things they could exchange for water
Cheers - John
#15
Posted 22 February 2012 - 17:30
#16
Posted 22 February 2012 - 17:42
What he really should be doing is sorting out the abomination of front gardens round here that only serve to encourage the rainwater to run off into the sewer and hence the rivers rather than into the ground water. Not to mention the back gardens that have been turns into granny flats, mostly illegally. They might look better too rather than the concrete that is presently in vogue. But god forbid he tells Londoners what they should be doing rather than coming up with hair-brained ideas that let them off the hook of responsibility.
The term concrete jungle was once the domain of the inner cities, but you could easily apply it to the suburbs now too.
#18
Posted 22 February 2012 - 18:57
scrapemedic, on 22 February 2012 - 17:42, said:
What he really should be doing is sorting out the abomination of front gardens round here that only serve to encourage the rainwater to run off into the sewer and hence the rivers rather than into the ground water. Not to mention the back gardens that have been turns into granny flats, mostly illegally. They might look better too rather than the concrete that is presently in vogue. But god forbid he tells Londoners what they should be doing rather than coming up with hair-brained ideas that let them off the hook of responsibility.
The term concrete jungle was once the domain of the inner cities, but you could easily apply it to the suburbs now too.
While I agree the concreting over of the suburbs is continuing apace, much of it illegally, its not all down to 'granny flats'. Much of it is due to pure greed and exploitation. I expect to be lambasted for posting this article from the Daily Mail, but I can assure you this is exactly what is happening in many West London suburbs. The population is exploding, and the resources, legal or otherwise, are diminishing day by day. I would give anything to be able to leave this place.
http://www.dailymail...immigrants.html
#20 Guest_Chris Lloyd_*
Posted 22 February 2012 - 20:12
Ian Williams, on 22 February 2012 - 03:13, said:
Need to get yourself a water meter Ian. Our annual bill for water is about 240 pounds.
If you pay rates, which I am guessing you do by the bill, you can't blame the system when cheaper water is available.












Sign In »
Register Now!
Help










