Stoke AcAsSL - 23/02/12 Stratocumulus Standing Lenticular
#1
Posted 23 February 2012 - 23:17
#2
Posted 24 February 2012 - 00:34
Forgive my ignorance. I thought lenticular clouds were all the same, sort of flying saucer shaped. I didn't know they could come from different types of cloud,
#3
Posted 24 February 2012 - 01:29
They do look lenticular in nature and the line of stratus below the strato/altostratus looks like it might be a roll cloud? Certainly if you look at the IR satelite imagary you can see a standing area of cloud that ties in nicely with your location.
rosskesava, on 24 February 2012 - 00:34, said:
Forgive my ignorance. I thought lenticular clouds were all the same, sort of flying saucer shaped. I didn't know they could come from different types of cloud,
Lenticular just refers to layered cloud that develops a lens like shape. The classic type that everyone tends to think of is the "stack of plates or flying saucer" shape because it is the most distinctive and easily recognizable formation but lensing of layered cloud can form in many kinds of situations where there is a laminar flow(non turbulant).
#4
Posted 24 February 2012 - 01:45
What *should* have been a day of 16'c heights ended up clouded-out thanks to the undercutting trough feature.
#5
Posted 24 February 2012 - 02:23
The cloud photographed has been induced by a standing wave, set up as stable air is forced to rise en-masse over the Pennines. If one looks at a satpic on the afternoon of this day, one would have seen a huge bank of white cloud forming just to the east of the Pennines and streaming downwind across the North Sea. What is being captured here is the western edge of the cloud sheet where the air is rising, and various layers of moisture are condensing out as a result, giving initially several layers of cloud, these then merging into a more amorphous layer as they stream downwind.
Investigation by tephigram would give this cloud sheet a base of between 20,000 and 24, 000 feet and a cloud top of between 35,000 and 40,000 feet!!! The air below this height is too dry for cloud to form, except from some weak CuSc in the bottom 3,000 feet of atmosphere. Therefore, it is a thick layer of AcAs.
The other thing of note, is the western edge of this cloud would have appeared as stationary. However, wind was blowing through this cloud layer at speeds of between 60 and 75 knots, the force of a Cat 1 hurricane.
N.
#6
Posted 24 February 2012 - 02:30
Nigel Bolton, on 24 February 2012 - 02:23, said:
Investigation by tephigram would give this cloud sheet a base of between 20,000 and 24, 000 feet and a cloud top of between 35,000 and 40,000 feet!!! The air below this height is too dry for cloud to form, except from some weak CuSc in the bottom 3,000 feet of atmosphere. Therefore, it is a thick layer of AcAs.
N.[/size][/font]
Yes I had feeling it was more altostratus. Don't know where I was going with "strato/altostratus" though - there is no such thing as stratostratus DOH! Thanks for the analysis.
This post has been edited by JohnG: 24 February 2012 - 02:31
#7
Posted 24 February 2012 - 13:18
This was taken about 10 minutes before sunset, looking NorthEast from Buxworth Basin.
This post has been edited by JOKE_SNOW: 24 February 2012 - 13:21
#8
Posted 24 February 2012 - 15:13
Cheers - John
#10
Posted 24 February 2012 - 23:15
#11
Posted 24 February 2012 - 23:32
I've spent a few hours reading up on the net about what Nigel posted above along with the other postings. I'm not sure I get it but somewhere in all that I've read, something sort of makes a bit more sense. I just wish I had the type of brain that could retain it all.
Still, amazing pictures though.
This post has been edited by rosskesava: 24 February 2012 - 23:37












Sign In »
Register Now!
Help






