Sign In »
Register Now!
Help
On iPlayer now. Start-sequence has some nice timelapse of rotating storms. Looks promising...
http://www.bbc.co.uk...rney_Episode_1/
Cheers - John
BBC: Orbit
#2 Guest_Chris Lloyd_*
Posted 05 March 2012 - 19:57
John Mason, on 05 March 2012 - 19:41, said:
On iPlayer now. Start-sequence has some nice timelapse of rotating storms. Looks promising...
http://www.bbc.co.uk...rney_Episode_1/
Cheers - John
http://www.bbc.co.uk...rney_Episode_1/
Cheers - John
This was on TV last night.
A good program - it was very good at explaining the Coriolis effect and how it shapes global weather patterns.
#3
Posted 05 March 2012 - 20:33
Just finished watching, Chris, and also thought it was pretty darn good! Wish I had a job like that!
Cheers - John
Cheers - John
#4
Posted 05 March 2012 - 20:39
The Beeb comes up trumps again. The fact that made me think was just how fast the planet travels through space!
#5 Guest_Village_*
Posted 06 March 2012 - 12:18
I found it quite drab and drawn out. very elimentary kind of stuff and slow to get to the point. Hope the second part is better.
#6
- Group: Members
- Posts: 391
- Joined: 18-July 11
- LocationTynemouth
Posted 06 March 2012 - 13:14
Coffee table television if u know what i mean.
Not very heavy and nice to look at.
Not very heavy and nice to look at.
#8
Posted 06 March 2012 - 15:41
Coffee Table TV! Good phrase, I'm going to borrow that...
There is a lot of it about. Perhaps they'll get bored of showing off HD cameras eventually.
There is a lot of it about. Perhaps they'll get bored of showing off HD cameras eventually.
#9 Guest_Chris Lloyd_*
Posted 06 March 2012 - 15:56
Some people actually like watching programs like this - myself included. What is wrong with a program that talks about what causes our weather patterns?
#10
- Group: Members
- Posts: 5147
- Joined: 23-July 04
- LocationSheffield, S8
Posted 06 March 2012 - 16:27
For those who may not have noticed, this program is connected to the 23 Degrees blog that has been linked to on here.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/23degrees/
I haven't watched it yet, but it's on the PVR.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/23degrees/
I haven't watched it yet, but it's on the PVR.
#11
- Group: Forum Managers
- Posts: 18305
- Joined: 01-March 04
- LocationNorth Herefordshire
Posted 06 March 2012 - 18:05
I thought it was aimed at pre - GCSE geography students tbh...
#12
- Group: Chasers
- Posts: 11482
- Joined: 26-June 05
- LocationNew Milton, Hampshire
Posted 06 March 2012 - 18:23
Howard Kirby, on 06 March 2012 - 18:05, said:
I thought it was aimed at pre - GCSE geography students tbh...
That's what I thought, but I wish I had a job like that!
Wasn't sure about the supercell footage when talking about hurricane formation though......
#13
Posted 06 March 2012 - 18:57
Chris Lloyd, on 06 March 2012 - 15:56, said:
Some people actually like watching programs like this - myself included. What is wrong with a program that talks about what causes our weather patterns?
You know what Chris? I agree with you!
#14
Posted 06 March 2012 - 19:27
Have to confess to enjoying stuff like this too... thought the Hadley cell animation was quite useful to visualise how the "rolling barrel" type of circulation is acted on by the coriolis effect...
#15
- Group: Members
- Posts: 391
- Joined: 18-July 11
- LocationTynemouth
Posted 06 March 2012 - 20:59
i didnt mean to appear to be slagging it off. it is what it is and if that what you want then thats fine.
your right tho those presenters have a well cushy job!
oh and Kate Humble is HOT!
your right tho those presenters have a well cushy job!
oh and Kate Humble is HOT!
#16
- Group: Members
- Posts: 192
- Joined: 17-June 07
- LocationWest Hove
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:13
It could have went a wee bit deeper into explaining Hadley Cell formation imo, i.e. exactly why as many of them occur as they do, and also their relationship with and formation of the jetstream - will assume at this point that any mention of the jetstream was ommitted until the end as it'll lead into a more indepth explanation in the next episode. Nice graphic representation though and I'd much preferred to have seen more of this to illustrate a point than watching the presenters going off on a jolly and needlessly jumping out of planes :/ But, as has already been stated, I guess its cos of the demographic its aimed at
#17 Guest_Chris Lloyd_*
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:24
Howard Kirby, on 06 March 2012 - 18:05, said:
I thought it was aimed at pre - GCSE geography students tbh...
I don't know many pre GCSE students that know about the Coriolis effect.
The program was always going to be easy reading for some on here, as has been said with many of the other programs that have been highlighted on here before.
However, I enjoyed it and I don't have any problem with weather for dummies programs. Some is better than none at all.
Conversely, if the program was more in depth people some would be complaining that it was too complicated.
#18 Guest_Chris Lloyd_*
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:36
Stu Short, on 07 March 2012 - 10:13, said:
Nice graphic representation though and I'd much preferred to have seen more of this to illustrate a point than watching the presenters going off on a jolly and needlessly jumping out of planes :/ But, as has already been stated, I guess its cos of the demographic its aimed at
Agree with that. Someone jumping out of a plane does not demonstrate why humid air over the tropics does not reach the desert regions. The presenters weren't complaining of course.
The explanation of the tides was good in some ways and not in others. The explanation of the Equinoxes gave a good insight into why tides are higher at these times.
What it didn't do was explain why there is a bulge of water on the other side of the planet, which is due to the centre of gravity of the earth moving towards the sun and moon, which causes the water to be under less gravitational pull on the other side, hence the bulge away towards space on the other side and 2 daily high tides. That to me is simple stuff and should have been in there.
#19
- Group: Members
- Posts: 5147
- Joined: 23-July 04
- LocationSheffield, S8
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:58
The fuller explanation of the tide was given in the star gazing series by Brian Cox, and you're right, doesn't take much more time add.
A programme that goes into the depth often asked for on here would be on BBC4 at about 1am and look a bit like the old Open University programmes - though that's not a criticism as I'd quite like those to return. This sort of programme wants to get in people who ordinarily wouldn't want to watch a "science" programme. It then at least gives a some information and hopefully some people will take it further.
Just worth pointing out that all this feedback can be posted at their blog (linked above).
A programme that goes into the depth often asked for on here would be on BBC4 at about 1am and look a bit like the old Open University programmes - though that's not a criticism as I'd quite like those to return. This sort of programme wants to get in people who ordinarily wouldn't want to watch a "science" programme. It then at least gives a some information and hopefully some people will take it further.
Just worth pointing out that all this feedback can be posted at their blog (linked above).
#20
- Group: Members
- Posts: 5147
- Joined: 23-July 04
- LocationSheffield, S8
Posted 07 March 2012 - 11:01
Chris Lloyd, on 07 March 2012 - 10:24, said:
I don't know many pre GCSE students that know about the Coriolis effect.
The program was always going to be easy reading for some on here, as has been said with many of the other programs that have been highlighted on here before.
However, I enjoyed it and I don't have any problem with weather for dummies programs. Some is better than none at all.
Conversely, if the program was more in depth people some would be complaining that it was too complicated.
The program was always going to be easy reading for some on here, as has been said with many of the other programs that have been highlighted on here before.
However, I enjoyed it and I don't have any problem with weather for dummies programs. Some is better than none at all.
Conversely, if the program was more in depth people some would be complaining that it was too complicated.
I agree, though I'm pretty certain we learnt about the coriolis effect in O-level geography, so I would have expected it to be covered now. Obviously that doesn't mean it is, I've no idea.
