Iceland Katla -Activity April 2012
#1
Posted 11 April 2012 - 08:16
http://hisz.rsoe.hu/...tmap/index2.php
Not sure if this is just another rumble or if something is going to develop. I know a few members have an interest so thought I would post see if they can give some more information as I haven't managed to find more info
#2
Posted 11 April 2012 - 08:23
#3
Posted 11 April 2012 - 08:34
#4
Posted 11 April 2012 - 08:37
#5
Posted 11 April 2012 - 16:46
#6
Posted 11 April 2012 - 17:14
#7
Posted 11 April 2012 - 17:18
Martyn Wells, on 11 April 2012 - 17:14, said:
It is the problem when words like "imminent" or "impending" are used that the context of geological timescale is forgotten, so it's a good attention grabber for the media at large on a slack news day. That said, it is obviously imperative to make contingency planning for such an eruption.
#8
Posted 11 April 2012 - 17:49
You know that it is very possible if the water intrusion in the Katla vent is low the eruptive force could likewise be muted. It is possible that the rise of Magma could have been slower then usual and the activity two years ago could have been the collapse of the near surface chambers, thus closing off the vent. We won't know for sure until either the vent emerges elsewhere or we have a very high energy release occurs. So far it looks pretty tame...
#9
Posted 11 April 2012 - 18:37
pete scott, on 11 April 2012 - 16:46, said:
Best it waits til after the 23rd May lol, same problem! I too remember waiting anxiously when we flew out in May 2010, praying it would be OK to fly
#10
Posted 11 April 2012 - 18:55
Martyn Wells, on 11 April 2012 - 17:14, said:
there was certainly a recent story in the Telegraph about it (found using the churnalism website).
#11
Posted 14 April 2012 - 04:47
Dave Hancox, on 11 April 2012 - 08:34, said:
Jon's now caught up with this story - http://www.jonfr.com/volcano/?p=2456 .
#12
Posted 14 April 2012 - 07:18
There is no evidence of any vent at Katla. There is no persistent harmonic tremor. And they'd likely be more than 1 if it did erupt as Katla has had many eruption site within and outside the caldera.
Also the talk and speculation is always of a major eruption, Katla is equally as capable of a VEI2 as a VEI4.
Thanks for the correction pk2, Eric klemmeti has also posted about it on his wired blog.
#13
Posted 14 April 2012 - 07:49
#14
Posted 14 April 2012 - 08:03
Dave, they wouldn't be the first to be "taken in" by a story that isn't what it seemed. That they've removed the report is a good sign IMHO. These days for I tend to look to the blogs run by the likes of Jon for news on volcanoes rather than the news site. Much as a look here for weather reports before looking elsewhere
#15
Posted 14 April 2012 - 13:00
Martyn Wells, on 14 April 2012 - 07:18, said:
There is no evidence of any vent at Katla. There is no persistent harmonic tremor. And they'd likely be more than 1 if it did erupt as Katla has had many eruption site within and outside the caldera.
Also the talk and speculation is always of a major eruption, Katla is equally as capable of a VEI2 as a VEI4.
Thanks for the correction pk2, Eric klemmeti has also posted about it on his wired blog.
Hey Martyn,
No active venting we are aware of.... (I see I am going to have to change my login to initals...) I was referencing the melt pool and the 3.X level activity about 18mths ago. I suspected that the dykes leading to the old vent may have collapsed then.
The result was a inverted caldera and some heat resulting in the depression/melt activity. Since then mostly the activiy is as most have suggested here, seasonal resettling.
Concur, that until the activity demonstrates magma movement and expansion of the caldera it is unlikely for a release. More to the point though unlikely greater then a VEI-4, I suspect when it finally does go it will be spectacular! (Sorry, or should I have said disasterous...?)
#16
Posted 15 May 2012 - 10:15
Elsewhere, a m3.1 quake followed by a series of aftershock occurred in in the Askja system, following on from other recent events discussing an ice free glacial lake in the area. These quakes were primarily around 15km deep, pointing perhaps to a new dyke intrusion.
#18
Posted 15 May 2012 - 11:44
Earthquake tableDateTimeLatitudeLongitudeDepthMagnitudeQualityLocationTuesday
15.05.201210:42:0565.159-16.4025.0 km2.190.013.0 km SW of HerðubreiðTuesday
15.05.201210:18:0165.004-16.9663.8 km2.937.4416.3 km SSW of LokatindurTuesday
15.05.201210:18:0065.184-16.4401.1 km2.290.014.4 km WNW of HerðubreiðTuesday
15.05.201210:17:5965.153-16.4260.9 km2.690.034.3 km WSW of HerðubreiðTuesday
15.05.201210:17:5865.119-16.7571.1 km2.661.685.4 km ESE of Lokatindur
This post has been edited by Martyn Wells: 15 May 2012 - 11:44
#19
Posted 15 May 2012 - 12:03
I didn't mind though, I had a fantastic time. Eyjafjallajokull is BEAUTIFULL!
#20
Posted 15 May 2012 - 12:10












Sign In »
Register Now!
Help










